Animal Classification
Kingdom Animalia
Grading Rubric
Multimedia Project : Animal Classification |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
Distinguished 9-10 Pts. |
Proficient 6-8 Pts.
|
Basic 3-5 Pts. |
Below Expectations 1-2 Pts.
|
Classification Requirements |
Student correctly classified 9 to 10 of their selected 10 animals into their correct classifications using bubble.us to create a mind map
|
Student Correctly classified at least 7 to 8 of their selected 10 animals into their correct classifications using bubble.us to create a mind map |
Student Correctly classified 4 to 6 of their selected 10 animals into their correct classifications using bubble.us to create a mind map
|
Student correctly classified less than 4 animals into their correct classification using bubble.us to create a mind map
|
Sources |
Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. |
Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. |
Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.
|
Very little or no source information was collected. |
Content |
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
|
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. |
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. |
Organization |
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material within mind map.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics in mind map appears flawed. |
Content in mind map is logically organized for the most part. |
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. |
Presentation |
Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. |
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. |
Originality |
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
|
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. |
Uses other people\'s ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
|
Uses other people\'s ideas, but does not give them credit. |
Collaborative Participation |
The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.
|
The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.
|
The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work. |
The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work. |
Mechanics |
No misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. |
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar. |